Linus Pauling, Ph.D, is a two time Nobel Prize winner in chemistry (1901-1994) and one of the most important scientists. He’s also one of the founders of quantum chemistry and molecular biology, and this great man once stated “Everyone should know that most cancer research is largely a fraud, and that the major cancer research organisations are derelict in their duties to the people who support them.”
But, he’s not the only great mind who thinks that. Dr. Marcia Angell, a physician and long time Editor in Chief of the New England Medical Journal (NEMJ), which is considered to be one of the most prestigious peer-reviewed medical journals in the world, has stated the following:
“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine.”
Moving on to Dr. John Bailer, who spent 20 years on the staff of the National Cancer Institute and is also a former editor of its journal, publicly stated in a meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science that:
“My overall assessment is that the national cancer program must be judged a qualified failure. Our whole cancer research in the past 20 years has been a total failure.”
And the list doesn’t stop here. In 1981 Dr. Irwin Bross, the former director of the Sloan-Kettering Cancer Research Institute (largest cancer research institute in the world), said that:
“The uselessness of most of the animal model studies is less well known. For example, the discovery of chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of human cancer is widely-heralded as a triumph due to use of animal model systems. However, here again, these exaggerated claims are coming from or are endorsed by the same people who get the federal dollars for animal research. There is little, if any, factual evidence that would support these claims. Practically all of the chemotherapeutic agents which are of value in the treatment of human cancer were found in a clinical context rather than in animal studies.”
Treating diseases has shown as a great profitable way for corporations to gain money. Dr. Dean Burk, an American biochemist and a senior chemist for the National Cancer Institute claimed that “When you have power you don’t have to tell the truth. That’s a rule that’s been working in this world for generations. And there are a great many people who don’t tell the truth when they are in power in administrative positions,” and also that “Fluoride causes more human cancer deaths than any other chemical. It is some of the most conclusive scientific and biological evidence that I have come across in my 50 years in the field of cancer research.”
His paper, The Determination of Enzyme Dissociation Constants published in the Journal of the American Chemical Society in 1934, is one of the most frequently cited papers in the history of biochemistry.
In April 15th, 2015 in the edition of Lancet, the UK’s leading medical journal, editor in chief Richard Horton stated:
“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Science has taken a turn toward darkness.”
In 2005 Dr. John P.A. Ioannidis, currently a professor in disease prevention at Stanford University also thinks that “There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false.” This was stated in his report Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.
So, basically, the fact that a large part of the results of cancer studies are fabricated and false is undeniable. In 2009, the University of Michigan’s comprehensive cancer center published an analysis that confirmed this.
This is exactly the reason why people start to be more alternative treatment oriented and focus on cancer prevention. Speaking of cancer prevention, nowadays it seems like a very hard thing to do since everything that surrounds us is linked to cancer; pesticides, GMOs, multiple cosmetic products, certain “foods,” smoking, and much much more.
There are numerous success stories related to cannabis oil treatment combined with a raw diet or even incorporated into their chemotherapy regimen. Its anti-cancer properties have been demonstrated for decades, yet no clinical trials are taking place.